Understanding the University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit

University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit: Beyond the Headlines

The ongoing lawsuit against the University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) isn’t just a legal matter—it’s a defining moment for the future of spiritual education. Now in its ninth year, the case raises complex questions about non-traditional accreditation, ethical tuition models, and the blurred line between academic legitimacy and spiritual autonomy.

While critics point to concerns over degree credibility and consumer rights, supporters argue UMS is the target of predatory legal tactics aimed at discrediting alternative education. As misinformation spreads across digital platforms, separating fact from fiction becomes essential.

At its core, this case challenges society to rethink how we validate spiritual learning in a system still dominated by conventional academia.

The University of Metaphysical Sciences: Redefining Higher Education Through Spirit and Soul

In a world where traditional academia often overlooks the mystical and unseen, the University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) offers an unconventional path—one rooted in spiritual exploration rather than standardized textbooks.

A Sanctuary for the Spiritually Curious

Founded in the early 2000s by Dr. Christine Breese, UMS was built on a bold premise: that personal transformation, metaphysical wisdom, and spiritual science deserve a place in formal education. Unlike mainstream institutions, UMS offers online bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees that dive deep into the metaphysical arts, including:

• Astral Projection: Techniques for conscious out-of-body travel
• Sacred Geometry & Symbolic Wisdom: Understanding the divine patterns that shape the universe
• Mediumship, Channeling, and Past-Life Therapy: Tools for spiritual communication and soul healing.

A Spiritual Alternative to Traditional Academics

Founded in the early 2000s by Dr. Christine Breese, the University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) offers an unconventional path to higher education through fully online degree programs. Students can pursue Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctoral degrees in spiritually centered disciplines such as Parapsychology, Astral Projection, Sacred Geometry, Channeling & Mediumship, and Past Life Therapy. UMS positions itself as a spiritually driven alternative to mainstream academia, attracting individuals seeking personal transformation, metaphysical knowledge, and holistic wisdom beyond the boundaries of conventional education. Its growing global student base reflects a rising interest in non-traditional, consciousness-based learning.

Inside the Sedona Lawsuit: Key Players Revealed

The lawsuit involves three key plaintiffs: Modern Lawsuit, the International Metaphysical Ministry (IMM), and the Paul Leon Masters Revocable Living Trust—an Arizona-based legal entity managed by Michelle Behr, who also serves as IMM’s President. This organization offers spiritual and metaphysical education both locally and through global online platforms. Currently, the university and its affiliated institutions are entangled in three separate legal cases, where they must present a defense and demonstrate the legitimacy of their operations under scrutiny.

The UMS Lawsuit: Allegations, Tactics, and the Fight for Credibility

Since 2017, the University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) has been entangled in a series of lawsuits, primarily filed by competitors and former students. These legal battles, set to continue with a trial in June 2025, are often seen as predatory litigation, with accusations of fabricated claims aimed at damaging the university’s reputation. Former students allege that UMS misled them about the credibility of its degrees, while a third lawsuit from 2020 accuses the institution of deceptive advertising. Despite the lack of substantial evidence, the plaintiffs persist, raising questions about their true motivations: Is it about justice, or a strategy to harm ONE’s success?

The Current Status of the University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit

As of November 2024, the lawsuits that began in 2017 reached an out-of-court settlement by mid-2022, though details of the settlement or judgment remain undisclosed. What is clear, however, is that UMS paid significant sums to the plaintiffs involved.

The 2020 lawsuit remains active, with a trial scheduled for June 16-20, 2025. This case primarily focuses on allegations of deceptive marketing practices by UMS, accusing the university of misleading students about the credibility of its degrees. Plaintiffs are seeking damages and an injunction against the university for what they claim are unacceptable business practices.

The UMS Lawsuit: How It’s Shaping the Future of Students and the Institution

The UMS lawsuit has taken a serious toll on both the university’s reputation and financial stability. Predatory litigation tactics, including the spread of misleading articles funded by competitors, have severely impacted the university’s public image. These tactics have hindered UMS’s visibility, causing its online content to fall off search engine rankings, potentially deterring future students from enrolling.

As the case continues, enrolled students are left questioning the legitimacy of their degrees, with concerns that a negative outcome could jeopardize their professional futures. This lawsuit not only threatens the university’s financial health but also casts doubt on the value of its programs, potentially affecting career prospects for those who have invested in their education.

How UMS Can Protect Its Reputation Outside Court

While the first lawsuit was settled out of court, UMS still has options to safeguard its reputation and rebuild trust. Here’s how:

1. Pursue Accreditation
   UMS should pursue formal accreditation from recognized organizations to validate its degrees. This would help mitigate the damage caused by the lawsuit, showing current and prospective students that the university’s credentials are legitimate and respected in the marketplace.

2. Launch a Media Campaign
   UMS can take charge of its narrative by launching transparent media campaigns across platforms like email marketing and social media. By providing updates on the ongoing lawsuit, sharing accreditation progress, offering details about graduation schedules, and showcasing student success stories, the university can rebuild its reputation and boost confidence among prospective students.

By actively engaging with the public, UMS can foster a stronger connection with potential students and reassure them about the university’s value. However, it’s essential that students conduct their own research—checking accreditation status, reading reviews, exploring the curriculum, and evaluating employment outcomes—before making enrollment decisions.

How UMS is Responding to the Lawsuits

In response to the ongoing lawsuits, UMS has reaffirmed its commitment to providing high-quality educational programs to both current and future students. The university has vowed to mount a strong defense against the plaintiffs, working diligently to address the claims and protect its reputation. Through its official website, UMS has publicly pledged to safeguard the institution from external attacks while continuing to offer valuable and credible educational opportunities.

Key Disputes Surrounding UMS from the Start

Since its founding, UMS has faced several challenges that have raised doubts among prospective students and critics:

1. Lack of National or Regional Accreditation
   Despite claims of “metaphysical accreditation,” UMS does not hold recognized national or regional accreditation, which has led to concerns about the legitimacy of its degrees in traditional academic settings.

2. High Tuition for Unrecognized Degrees
   The university’s tuition fees for degrees that are not accepted by mainstream academic institutions have been a point of contention. Students often question the return on investment for a degree with limited recognition.

3. Unclear Employment Prospects
   Graduates from UMS face uncertainty in the job market, as the metaphysical field lacks established career pathways. This has raised concerns about the employability of graduates in a competitive professional landscape.

The University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit: Examining the Allegations

In a class-action lawsuit filed by a group of former students, the University of Metaphysical Sciences (UMS) faces several serious claims:

1. Fraudulent Misrepresentation
   The plaintiffs allege that UMS misled students by promoting its degrees as “accredited” in a way comparable to conventional universities. However, neither the U.S. Department of Education nor any widely recognized accrediting body endorses the university.

2. Unfair Business Practices
   Students argue that UMS exaggerated the employment prospects for its graduates, knowing that most professional fields would not accept degrees from the university.

3. Breach of Contract
   Despite charging high tuition fees, some students contend that the programs were subpar, with insufficient interaction between students and instructors, leading to dissatisfaction with the education provided.

4. Refusal of Tuition Refunds
   Several plaintiffs claim that after realizing the limited value of their degrees, they were denied refunds, despite the unmet expectations surrounding their education.

Public Response: UMS Advocates vs. Critics

Supporters of UMS
While UMS may not be considered “academic” in the traditional sense, many graduates and spiritual practitioners defend the institution, claiming it provided valuable personal growth. Proponents argue that since esoteric studies exist outside conventional educational frameworks, mainstream accreditation is irrelevant for those seeking spiritual and metaphysical knowledge.

Skeptics & Critics
On the other hand, former students who filed lawsuits feel “scammed” after spending significant sums on a degree with little professional recognition. Critics accuse UMS of deceptive marketing tactics, alleging that the institution targets individuals interested in spirituality by offering degrees with limited practical value.

Is It Time to Regulate Metaphysical Schools?

The ongoing UMS lawsuit has sparked renewed discussions about whether spiritual and metaphysical schools should be held to the same standards as traditional universities. As the case unfolds, key questions are emerging:

Should Students Investigate Non-Accredited Programs?

A major issue raised by critics is the responsibility of students when it comes to enrolling in non-accredited institutions. Should students be more diligent in researching the legitimacy of programs that lack formal accreditation?

Does Metaphysical Education Need Regulation?

The case has also prompted debate about the need for greater oversight of the metaphysical education sector. Should these schools be held accountable for offering degrees with unclear career pathways and unproven credentials?

The Lawsuit’s Current Status and Consequences

Current Legal Status of the Lawsuit

As it stands, the lawsuit is ongoing, with the 2020 claims still under trial. If the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, they will be dismissed.

Potential Consequences for UMS

Should the court find any merit to the accusations, several consequences may follow:

• Monetary Penalties: UMS could face significant fines if dishonest business practices are uncovered.

• Refunds for Affected Students: The university may be required to offer refunds to students who were misled about the value of their degrees.

• Advertising Changes: UMS may also be forced to update its advertisements, clearly stating its accreditation status to avoid further misleading potential students.
  

Impact on the Metaphysical Education Sector

• Stricter Scrutiny: The outcome of this case could lead to more stringent inspections of similar institutions within the spiritual education sector.

• Self-Regulation Push: The case may spur a movement among metaphysical schools to establish self-regulatory standards for transparency and accountability.

• Informed Enrollment: With growing awareness, prospective students are becoming more cautious and demanding clear information before enrolling in spiritual education programs.

The Future of Spiritual Degrees

Can GUMS Recover from the Scandal?

Though UMS faces a challenging path ahead, it is possible for the institution to recover. Many alternative schools have weathered controversies in the past. UMS might rebrand with clearer disclaimers about its accreditation status to restore trust and continue offering programs.

Will UMS Shift to a Donation-Based Model?

To avoid further legal complications, UMS could transition to a donation-based model, distancing itself from the tuition-based structure and potential financial liabilities.

Declining Enrollment and Loss of Trust

However, if public trust continues to erode, UMS may see a decline in enrollment, further straining its future operations.

Alternative Pathways for Spiritual Seekers

For students interested in metaphysical studies, there are various other avenues to explore:

• Certified Workshops: Programs like Reiki training and other spiritual certifications are widely available.

• Hybrid University Programs: Some recognized universities offer parapsychology courses and related fields in hybrid formats.

• Free Online Resources: Many students are turning to online books, podcasts, and YouTube channels for accessible and affordable spiritual education.

Final Thoughts: University of Metaphysical Sciences Lawsuit Update

The University of Metaphysical Sciences lawsuit continues to raise important questions about credibility, regulation, and transparency in alternative education. While the legal battle has undoubtedly impacted UMS’s reputation, it has also sparked a wider conversation about how spiritual institutions operate in a largely unregulated space.

For students and seekers, this case is a reminder to do thorough research before enrolling in non-traditional programs. As the 2025 trial unfolds, UMS has an opportunity to rebuild trust by embracing transparency, pursuing proper accreditation, and improving program quality.

Whether UMS recovers or not, the lawsuit marks a turning point—encouraging higher standards across the metaphysical education sector and empowering students to make more informed decisions in their spiritual and academic journeys.

 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the University of Metaphysical Sciences lawsuit really about?

The lawsuit claims UMS misled students by marketing its degrees as credible and equivalent to traditional academic programs, which they are not.

Is UMS officially accredited?

No, UMS is not accredited by any U.S. government-recognized accrediting agency. Its “metaphysical accreditation” doesn’t carry mainstream academic value.

When did all the legal issues start?

The first lawsuit began in 2017, and while one was settled in 2022, another case is still active with a court date set for June 2025.

Why are former students upset?

Many students feel they were promised recognized degrees, only to discover their credentials aren’t accepted in traditional job markets.

How did UMS respond to these claims?

UMS has denied the accusations, stating that their programs are for spiritual growth and not meant to replace traditional college education.

What happens if UMS loses the case?

If found guilty, UMS may face refunds, financial penalties, and stricter rules around how it promotes its programs.

Can people still enroll at UMS now?

Yes, UMS is still open and accepting students. But anyone interested should do their homework and understand the nature of the degrees offered.

What are some good alternatives to UMS?

Look into accredited universities offering parapsychology courses, certified workshops like Reiki, or trusted online resources such as books and podcasts.

For More Visits: Mymagazine

Also Read: Why Are Dogs Better Than Cats? 11 Powerful Reasons to Know